You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Consider the following hierarchy for an example enterprise.
81
-
This hierarchy, which creates fewer |service| organizations, might be useful if you have common teams and permissions across the business unit, and less than the raiseable limit of 250 projects per organization.
119
+
This hierarchy, which creates fewer |service| organizations, might be useful if you have common teams and permissions across the {+BU+}, and less than the raiseable limit of 250 projects per organization.
82
120
83
121
**DIAGRAM TO REPLACE TEXT**
84
122
@@ -93,7 +131,7 @@ This hierarchy, which creates fewer |service| organizations, might be useful if
93
131
- Project: Product Mgmt App - Test
94
132
- Project: Product Mgmt App - Dev
95
133
96
-
- Atlas Org: Corporate Products BU
134
+
- Atlas Org: Corporate Products {+BU+}
97
135
98
136
.. _project-hierarchy-2:
99
137
@@ -103,7 +141,7 @@ Recommended Hierarchy 2: More Atlas Organizations
103
141
Consider the following hierarchy for a different enterprise.
104
142
This hierarchy creates a relatively large number of |service|
105
143
organizations: one per application or scrum team. This hierarchy might
106
-
be useful if each of your teams is fairly independent, they don't share people or permissions within a business unit, or they want to buy credits themselves through the cloud provider marketplace. There is
144
+
be useful if each of your teams is fairly independent, they don't share people or permissions within a {+BU+}, or they want to buy credits themselves through the cloud provider marketplace. There is
0 commit comments