Skip to content

Secure Source of Randomness #29

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

pixeebot[bot]
Copy link

@pixeebot pixeebot bot commented Jul 20, 2025

This codemod replaces all instances of functions in the random module (e.g. random.random() with their, much more secure, equivalents from the secrets module (e.g. secrets.SystemRandom().random()).

There is significant algorithmic complexity in getting computers to generate genuinely unguessable random bits. The random.random() function uses a method of pseudo-random number generation that unfortunately emits fairly predictable numbers.

If the numbers it emits are predictable, then it's obviously not safe to use in cryptographic operations, file name creation, token construction, password generation, and anything else that's related to security. In fact, it may affect security even if it's not directly obvious.

Switching to a more secure version is simple and the changes look something like this:

- import random
+ import secrets
  ...
- random.random()
+ secrets.SystemRandom().random()
More reading

🧚🤖 Powered by Pixeebot

Feedback | Community | Docs | Codemod ID: pixee:python/secure-random

Copy link
Author

pixeebot bot commented Jul 28, 2025

I'm confident in this change, and the CI checks pass, too!

If you see any reason not to merge this, or you have suggestions for improvements, please let me know!

Copy link
Author

pixeebot bot commented Jul 29, 2025

Just a friendly ping to remind you about this change. If there are concerns about it, we'd love to hear about them!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants