Skip to content

[CWG 2] P2796R0 issues 2674 and 2691 #6119

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2023
Merged

[CWG 2] P2796R0 issues 2674 and 2691 #6119

merged 2 commits into from
Mar 5, 2023

Conversation

burblebee
Copy link
Contributor

@burblebee burblebee commented Feb 15, 2023

Fixes #6084.
Fixes #5420.

@burblebee burblebee marked this pull request as ready for review February 15, 2023 17:34
@jensmaurer jensmaurer added this to the post-2023-02 milestone Feb 16, 2023
@tkoeppe tkoeppe force-pushed the motions-2023-02-cwg-2 branch from 22bf989 to 0c937da Compare March 5, 2023 17:13
@tkoeppe tkoeppe merged commit d87a206 into main Mar 5, 2023
@tkoeppe tkoeppe deleted the motions-2023-02-cwg-2 branch May 10, 2023 17:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[2023-02 CWG Motion 2] P2796R0 issues 2674 and 2691 [dcl.fct] p6 Does it make sense that a constructor can have an explicit object parameter?
4 participants