P3022 R1 A Boring Thread Attributes Interface

[wg21bot]

P3022R0 A Boring Thread Attributes Interface (David Sankel, Darius Neațu)

[camio]

D3022R0: A Boring Thread Attributes Interface
Was scheduled for Kona 2023 meeting

[ben-craig]

Library Evolution Meeting Kona 2023-11-07

D3022R1: A Boring Thread Attributes Interface

2023-11-07 Library Evolution Kona Minutes

Champion: Darius Neatu

Chair: Ben Craig / Robert Leahy

Minute Taker: Nevin Liber

Start: 2023-11-07

Summary

POLL: The attribute approach in P3022 (attributes class) is acceptable for C++, even considering extensibility and usability concerns

Strongly Favor	Weakly Favor	Neutral	Weakly Against	Strongly Against
4	8	5	6	1

Attendance: 26+8

# of Authors (P3022): 2

Author Position: SF

Outcome: Insufficient consensus relative to next poll

POLL: The attribute approach in P2019 (named attributes in ctors) is acceptable for C++, even considering extensibility and usability concerns

Strongly Favor	Weakly Favor	Neutral	Weakly Against	Strongly Against
7	9	2	0	4

Attendance: 28+8

# of Authors (P2019): 1

Author Position: SF

Outcome: Going with this approach

SA: This looks like properties that this room rejected, not sure why we are using nice names for this. P0900 was rejected
SA: Not the most natural way of setting properties in C++
SA: Lots of new names in namespace std, implementation experience in boost is a positive

Next Steps

This new direction was considered, but there was more consensus for the old direction. Closing this paper.