Error deserializing co.elastic.clients.elasticsearch._types.StoreStats

[Au6ojlut]

Java API client version

8.4.3

Java version

11

Elasticsearch Version

8.4.1

Problem description

The JsonpMappingException is thrown on ElasticsearchAsyncClient.nodes().stats().join() call

According to exception message, the field indices.store.size_in_bytes must be long not int

        co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpMappingException: Error deserializing co.elastic.clients.elasticsearch._types.StoreStats: jakarta.json.stream.JsonParsingException: Jackson exception: Numeric v
alue (39969149815) out of range of int (-2147483648 - 2147483647)
 at [Source: (org.apache.http.nio.entity.ContentInputStream); line: 1, column: 639] (JSON path: nodes.{{NODE_ID}}.indices.store.size_in_bytes) (line no=1, column no=639, offset=-
1)1)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpMappingException.from0(JsonpMappingException.java:134)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpMappingException.from(JsonpMappingException.java:121)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:206)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:136)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializer.java:75)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectBuilderDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectBuilderDeserializer.java:79)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.DelegatingDeserializer$SameType.deserialize(DelegatingDeserializer.java:43)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer$FieldObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:71)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:180)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:136)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializer.java:75)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectBuilderDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectBuilderDeserializer.java:79)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.DelegatingDeserializer$SameType.deserialize(DelegatingDeserializer.java:43)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer$FieldObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:71)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:180)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:136)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializer.java:75)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectBuilderDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectBuilderDeserializer.java:79)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.DelegatingDeserializer$SameType.deserialize(DelegatingDeserializer.java:43)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializerBase$StringMapDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializerBase.java:347)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializerBase$StringMapDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializerBase.java:331)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializer.java:75)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer$FieldObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:71)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:180)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectDeserializer.java:136)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.JsonpDeserializer.deserialize(JsonpDeserializer.java:75)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.ObjectBuilderDeserializer.deserialize(ObjectBuilderDeserializer.java:79)
        at co.elastic.clients.json.DelegatingDeserializer$SameType.deserialize(DelegatingDeserializer.java:43)
        at co.elastic.clients.transport.rest_client.RestClientTransport.decodeResponse(RestClientTransport.java:328)
        at co.elastic.clients.transport.rest_client.RestClientTransport.getHighLevelResponse(RestClientTransport.java:294)
        at co.elastic.clients.transport.rest_client.RestClientTransport.access$200(RestClientTransport.java:63)
        at co.elastic.clients.transport.rest_client.RestClientTransport$1.onSuccess(RestClientTransport.java:168)
        at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient$FailureTrackingResponseListener.onSuccess(RestClient.java:678)
        at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient$1.completed(RestClient.java:399)
        at org.elasticsearch.client.RestClient$1.completed(RestClient.java:393)
        at org.apache.http.concurrent.BasicFuture.completed(BasicFuture.java:122)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.client.DefaultClientExchangeHandlerImpl.responseCompleted(DefaultClientExchangeHandlerImpl.java:182)
        at org.apache.http.nio.protocol.HttpAsyncRequestExecutor.processResponse(HttpAsyncRequestExecutor.java:448)
        at org.apache.http.nio.protocol.HttpAsyncRequestExecutor.inputReady(HttpAsyncRequestExecutor.java:338)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.DefaultNHttpClientConnection.consumeInput(DefaultNHttpClientConnection.java:265)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.client.InternalIODispatch.onInputReady(InternalIODispatch.java:87)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.client.InternalIODispatch.onInputReady(InternalIODispatch.java:40)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIODispatch.inputReady(AbstractIODispatch.java:114)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.BaseIOReactor.readable(BaseIOReactor.java:162)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIOReactor.processEvent(AbstractIOReactor.java:337)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIOReactor.processEvents(AbstractIOReactor.java:315)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractIOReactor.execute(AbstractIOReactor.java:276)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.BaseIOReactor.execute(BaseIOReactor.java:104)
        at org.apache.http.impl.nio.reactor.AbstractMultiworkerIOReactor$Worker.run(AbstractMultiworkerIOReactor.java:591)
        at java.base/java.lang.Thread.run(Unknown Source)

[Au6ojlut]

Looks like the issue exists for some time

#433
#296
#379

Can it be fixed during next api spec code generation?

[l-trotta]

Thanks for the report and sorry for the long wait! This was recently fixed and will be part of the next release.