Skip to content

Enhance elixir-mode-iex to accept additional arguments #22

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2013

Conversation

artisonian
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@tonini
Copy link
Contributor

tonini commented Jul 15, 2013

Hi

Thanks for your contribution.

But I'm still no happy with the default -S mix arguments. I think you won't always run iex in the context of the application. iex -S mix will run the default mix task which is mix run if you doesn't set another one in your mix.exs file. So as an example, if you would do this in the context of the elixir source directory, it would compile the whole thing first...

I think the adding of the universal-argument is a good idea. Actually I would like to have something like inf-ruby in the near future. So for now I think the universal-argument is a good solution, and you don't need your -S mix anymore. ;)

So please update the branch.

Cheers

@artisonian
Copy link
Contributor Author

@tonini I'll have to check out inf-ruby (though a bit daunting for an elisp beginner). For now, I've rebased the branch to get rid of the -S mix commit. How would I write a unit test for this?

tonini added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2013
Enhance `elixir-mode-iex` to accept additional arguments
@tonini tonini merged commit 30010a1 into elixir-editors:master Jul 17, 2013
@tonini
Copy link
Contributor

tonini commented Jul 17, 2013

Thank you! :)

J3RN pushed a commit to J3RN/emacs-elixir that referenced this pull request Apr 24, 2021
* Describe the reasoning behind the fork

Fixes elixir-editors#22

* Remove unnecessary sentence
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants