Skip to content

Fixes for miner #599

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Feb 17, 2022
Merged

Fixes for miner #599

merged 5 commits into from
Feb 17, 2022

Conversation

ortyomka
Copy link
Contributor

Description of the Change

Benefits

Possible Drawbacks

Usage Examples or Tests [optional]

Alternate Designs [optional]

recordPieceInfo(deal_context->deal, maybe_piece_location.value()),
"Record piece failed",
deal_context);
deal_context->maybe_piece_location = maybe_piece_location.value();
// TODO(a.chernyshov): add piece retry
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I suppose the comment is not relevant anymore.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It could be relevant, if sealing cannot store it for now. But after sometime it could

Signed-off-by: ortyomka <[email protected]>
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 17, 2022

Codecov Report

Merging #599 (dfefe1b) into master (ad026fd) will increase coverage by 0.02%.
The diff coverage is 61.53%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #599      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   46.00%   46.02%   +0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         713      715       +2     
  Lines       32293    32328      +35     
  Branches    17876    17885       +9     
==========================================
+ Hits        14855    14880      +25     
- Misses      13095    13102       +7     
- Partials     4343     4346       +3     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...re/markets/storage/provider/impl/provider_impl.hpp 36.84% <ø> (ø)
core/sector_storage/impl/manager_impl.hpp 33.33% <ø> (ø)
core/sector_storage/impl/remote_worker.cpp 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
core/sector_storage/worker.hpp 62.50% <ø> (ø)
core/storage/piece/impl/piece_storage_impl.cpp 47.94% <0.00%> (-2.06%) ⬇️
...re/markets/storage/provider/impl/provider_impl.cpp 62.00% <16.66%> (-0.53%) ⬇️
core/miner/storage_fsm/impl/sealing_impl.cpp 43.37% <50.00%> (+0.04%) ⬆️
core/common/vector_cow.hpp 72.72% <72.72%> (ø)
core/sector_storage/impl/manager_impl.cpp 61.04% <75.00%> (+0.40%) ⬆️
core/sector_storage/impl/local_worker.cpp 71.14% <87.50%> (+0.14%) ⬆️
... and 1 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update ad026fd...dfefe1b. Read the comment docs.

Signed-off-by: ortyomka <[email protected]>
@ortyomka ortyomka merged commit 9f37400 into master Feb 17, 2022
@ortyomka ortyomka deleted the fix/miner branch February 17, 2022 19:37
Markuu-s pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
* Miner Fixes

Signed-off-by: ortyomka <[email protected]>
Markuu-s pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
* Miner Fixes

Signed-off-by: ortyomka <[email protected]>
Markuu-s pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 10, 2022
* Miner Fixes

Signed-off-by: ortyomka <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants