Add json allowlist of specific types

[rrousselGit]

Currently, json_serializable does not support custom JSON format which contains classes other than Map/String/num/...

An example would be Firestore, which on top of your typical String/bool/... may also have Timestamp/GeoPoint/DocumentReference as Map values.

Meaning that if we're doing:

@JsonSerializable
class Foo {
  <...>
  final Timestamp timestamp;
}

then json_serializable will complain with the error:

Could not generate `fromJson` code for `timestamp`.
To support the type `Timestamp` you can:
* Use `JsonConverter`
  https://pub.dev/documentation/json_annotation/latest/json_annotation/JsonConverter-class.html
* Use `JsonKey` fields `fromJson` and `toJson`
  https://pub.dev/documentation/json_annotation/latest/json_annotation/JsonKey/fromJson.html
  https://pub.dev/documentation/json_annotation/latest/json_annotation/JsonKey/toJson.html
package:cloud_firestore_odm_generator_integration_test/simple.dart:15:19

The problem is, this error is technically incorrect in this specific use-case since we don't need to encode/decode Timestamp.

We could use JsonConverter/JsonKey, but that is not ideal since they can't be applied to the entire project.

Proposal

We could add a way to globally tell json_serializable to not do anything when encountering certain types.

This could be a configuration inside the build.yaml file, such as:

json_serializable:
  options:
     allowed-types:
         - name: Timestamp
            source: "package:cloud_firestore/cloud_firestore.dart"

Then, when json_serializable will encounter a property typed as Timestamp, the generated code will simply perform as cast instead of trying to call fromJson/toJson.

[kevmoo]

This is an abuse of JSON – but I get it. PR welcome here!

[rrousselGit]

Alternatively, do you believe there's a way to define global type-converters?

We could technically have a TypeConverter simply cast the value. But ideally, it shouldn't require using the converter on every single property matching

[atoka93]

Was just checking if there are global type-converters, would love that.

[kevmoo]

You can create your own json_serializable package and augment the type_converters provided. The APIs are all public-ish.

[atoka93]

A bit more code than adding it to the build.yaml but still fairly simple and would solve the issue 🤔
Thanks for the idea @kevmoo!

For anyone reading this who would like an example on how to do that:
@knaeckeKami has one here:
https://github.com/knaeckeKami/json_serializable_immutable_collections/tree/master/builders/json_serializable_mobx
and an explanation regarding it here:
jperezr21/json_serializable_immutable_collections#15 (comment)

[knaeckeKami]

The way I do it in these packages is a bit hacky. I always wished we could specify additional TypeHelpers in the build.yaml, (like ferry does it for example: https://ferrygraphql.com/docs/custom-scalars#configure-custom-serializer ) but this would not be a trivial thing to implement in the existing architecture of json_serializable.

[ciriousjoker]

This is especially relevant now that Firestore ODM is on its way, since it promotes using JsonSerializable to write the models. It would be awesome if the solution for this issue would be a small code snippet that can quickly be added to the getting started instructions over there.

[idotalmor]

I must say I don't like the way the models are created in conjunction with firestore types. that makes the app coupled with firestore which is backend implementation details. please consider alternative solutions.

[FXschwartz]

Any progress on this one? Has an ideal solution been found and we are waiting on implementation?

Running into this using Firestore ODM

[ciriousjoker]

@idotalmor
Not necessarily. Just having an annotation that says "don't convert this field" would be enough to support Firestore and no new dependencies would be required.

[kevmoo]

I could just put bool ignoreType field on JsonKey – would that work?

[ciriousjoker]

@kevmoo Assuming it still includes the property in the generated class, yes that should be enough.

[kevmoo]

@kevmoo Assuming it still includes the property in the generated class, yes that should be enough.

The really tricking thing will be if the type is used like List<Map<String, WeirdObject>> – will need to ponder that...

[FXschwartz]

Is there an example on how to use JsonConverter/JsonKey to handle this as a workaround?