Fixed coverity issues in acl_program.cpp #228
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
zibaiwan
reviewed
Jan 10, 2023
zibaiwan
requested changes
Jan 14, 2023
haoxian2
force-pushed
the
coverity-acl-program
branch
from
42c4afd to
6ae25c9
Compare
zibaiwan
previously approved these changes
Jan 18, 2023
haoxian2
force-pushed
the
coverity-acl-program
branch
from
6ae25c9 to
c05d279
Compare
haoxian2
force-pushed
the
coverity-acl-program
branch
from
69cb093 to
af9910e
Compare
zibaiwan
approved these changes
Jan 19, 2023
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixed coverity in acl_program.cpp: Dead default in switch (DEADCODE)
(line 256) Default branch never reached since
switch (pass)only has 0 and 1 as values becausepassis defined in a for-loop (line 225) as< 2.Fixed coverity in acl_program.cpp: Dereference before null check (REVERSE_INULL)
(line 145) Program is already dereferenced in the for-loop above to check
program->num_devices, so the check would also pass.Fixed coverity in acl_program.cpp: Use after free (USE_AFTER_FREE)
(line 1834) Coverity complains that you should not print the pointer address value if it has already been freed. Since we are not accessing what's in the pointer itself, it is safe to query about pointer address value. Therefore, instead of passing the pointer as the argument, a dereferenced pointer to that pointer is passed as an argument instead.