-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 19.6k
Fix _can_use_flash_attention
.
#21512
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix _can_use_flash_attention
.
#21512
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Summary of Changes
Hello @james77777778, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!
This pull request enhances the robustness of the _can_use_flash_attention
function within the JAX backend. It achieves this by implementing a more flexible approach to passing keyword arguments to the check_layout
utility, ensuring that the function can adapt to changes in check_layout
's signature without requiring manual updates.
Highlights
- Dynamic Keyword Argument Handling: The
_can_use_flash_attention
function now dynamically determines and passesNone
for any unspecified keyword arguments to thecheck_layout
function. This change makes the call more robust and resilient to future modifications in thecheck_layout
function's signature, addressing potential issues where new parameters might be added. - New Module Import: The
inspect
module has been imported intokeras/src/backend/jax/nn.py
. This module is crucial for enabling the dynamic introspection of function signatures, which is a core part of the new keyword argument handling logic.
Using Gemini Code Assist
The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.
Invoking Gemini
You can request assistance from Gemini at any point in your pull request via creating an issue comment (i.e. comment on the pull request page) using either /gemini <command>
or @gemini-code-assist <command>
. Below is a summary of the supported commands.
Feature | Command | Description |
---|---|---|
Code Review | /gemini review |
Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state. |
Pull Request Summary | /gemini summary |
Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state. |
Comment | @gemini-code-assist | Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in issue comments and review comments. |
Help | /gemini help |
Displays a list of available commands. |
Customization
To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/
folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.
Limitations & Feedback
Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments or fill out our survey to provide feedback.
You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.
Footnotes
-
Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution. ↩
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Code Review
This pull request improves the robustness of _can_use_flash_attention
by dynamically determining the parameters for check_layout
using inspect.signature
. This is a good change that avoids hardcoding parameter names and makes the code more resilient to upstream changes in JAX.
My review includes a suggestion to cache the result of inspect.signature
to mitigate potential performance overhead, as this function may be on a hot path. This ensures we get the robustness benefits without a performance penalty on subsequent calls.
Codecov ReportAttention: Patch coverage is
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #21512 +/- ##
==========================================
- Coverage 82.72% 82.71% -0.01%
==========================================
Files 567 567
Lines 56214 56219 +5
Branches 8786 8787 +1
==========================================
+ Hits 46501 46502 +1
- Misses 7556 7560 +4
Partials 2157 2157
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
Fix #21507
This PR addresses the issue by using
None
for kwargs if not specified in_can_use_flash_attention
.Hopefully, this change will make the impl more robust.