-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.5k
release/21.x: [clang] Fix pointer comparisons between pointers to constexpr-unknown (#147663) #148907
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
llvmbot
wants to merge
1
commit into
llvm:release/21.x
Choose a base branch
from
llvmbot:issue147663
base: release/21.x
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+44
−14
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…llvm#147663) A constexpr-unknown reference can be equal to an arbitrary value, except values allocated during constant evaluation. Fix the handling. The standard is unclear exactly which pointer comparisons count as "unknown" in this context; for example, in some cases we could use alignment to prove two constexpr-unknown references are not equal. I decided to ignore all the cases involving variables not allocated during constant evaluation. While looking at this, I also spotted that there might be issues with lifetimes, but I didn't try to address it. (cherry picked from commit 20c8e3c)
@zygoloid What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 20c8e3c Requested by: @efriedma-quic Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/148907.diff 4 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
index bd7a4b20242fd..2add72a1654b1 100644
--- a/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
+++ b/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.rst
@@ -967,6 +967,7 @@ Bug Fixes to C++ Support
- Fix a crash with NTTP when instantiating local class.
- Fixed a crash involving list-initialization of an empty class with a
non-empty initializer list. (#GH147949)
+- Fixed constant evaluation of equality comparisons of constexpr-unknown references. (#GH147663)
Bug Fixes to AST Handling
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
index 419dd5dbdc695..1b33b6706e204 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ExprConstant.cpp
@@ -14478,12 +14478,6 @@ EvaluateComparisonBinaryOperator(EvalInfo &Info, const BinaryOperator *E,
if (!EvaluatePointer(E->getRHS(), RHSValue, Info) || !LHSOK)
return false;
- // If we have Unknown pointers we should fail if they are not global values.
- if (!(IsGlobalLValue(LHSValue.getLValueBase()) &&
- IsGlobalLValue(RHSValue.getLValueBase())) &&
- (LHSValue.AllowConstexprUnknown || RHSValue.AllowConstexprUnknown))
- return false;
-
// Reject differing bases from the normal codepath; we special-case
// comparisons to null.
if (!HasSameBase(LHSValue, RHSValue)) {
@@ -14545,6 +14539,10 @@ EvaluateComparisonBinaryOperator(EvalInfo &Info, const BinaryOperator *E,
(LHSValue.Base && isZeroSized(RHSValue)))
return DiagComparison(
diag::note_constexpr_pointer_comparison_zero_sized);
+ if (LHSValue.AllowConstexprUnknown || RHSValue.AllowConstexprUnknown)
+ return DiagComparison(
+ diag::note_constexpr_pointer_comparison_unspecified);
+ // FIXME: Verify both variables are live.
return Success(CmpResult::Unequal, E);
}
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx14.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx14.cpp
index e16a69df3830d..e93b98c185a82 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx14.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-cxx14.cpp
@@ -1321,3 +1321,18 @@ constexpr bool check = different_in_loop();
// expected-error@-1 {{}} expected-note@-1 {{in call}}
}
+
+namespace comparison_dead_variable {
+ constexpr bool f() {
+ int *p1 = 0, *p2 = 0;
+ {
+ int x = 0; p1 = &x;
+ }
+ {
+ int x = 0; p2 = &x;
+ }
+ return p1 != p2;
+ }
+ // FIXME: This should fail.
+ static_assert(f(),"");
+}
diff --git a/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-p2280r4.cpp b/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-p2280r4.cpp
index dffb386f530f4..03fea91169787 100644
--- a/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-p2280r4.cpp
+++ b/clang/test/SemaCXX/constant-expression-p2280r4.cpp
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@ namespace casting {
}
namespace pointer_comparisons {
- extern int &extern_n; // interpreter-note 2 {{declared here}}
+ extern int &extern_n; // interpreter-note 4 {{declared here}}
extern int &extern_n2;
constexpr int f1(bool b, int& n) {
if (b) {
@@ -330,14 +330,30 @@ namespace pointer_comparisons {
// FIXME: interpreter incorrectly rejects; both sides are the same constexpr-unknown value.
static_assert(f1(false, extern_n)); // interpreter-error {{static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression}} \
// interpreter-note {{initializer of 'extern_n' is unknown}}
- // FIXME: We should diagnose this: we don't know if the references bind
- // to the same object.
- static_assert(&extern_n != &extern_n2); // interpreter-error {{static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression}} \
+ static_assert(&extern_n != &extern_n2); // expected-error {{static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression}} \
+ // nointerpreter-note {{comparison between pointers to unrelated objects '&extern_n' and '&extern_n2' has unspecified value}} \
// interpreter-note {{initializer of 'extern_n' is unknown}}
void f2(const int &n) {
- // FIXME: We should not diagnose this: the two objects provably have
- // different addresses because the lifetime of "n" extends across
- // the initialization.
- constexpr int x = &x == &n; // nointerpreter-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}}
+ constexpr int x = &x == &n; // nointerpreter-error {{must be initialized by a constant expression}} \
+ // nointerpreter-note {{comparison between pointers to unrelated objects '&x' and '&n' has unspecified value}}
+ // Distinct variables are not equal, even if they're local variables.
+ constexpr int y = &x == &y;
+ static_assert(!y);
}
+ constexpr int f3() {
+ int x;
+ return &x == &extern_n; // nointerpreter-note {{comparison between pointers to unrelated objects '&x' and '&extern_n' has unspecified value}} \
+ // interpreter-note {{initializer of 'extern_n' is unknown}}
+ }
+ static_assert(!f3()); // expected-error {{static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression}} \
+ // expected-note {{in call to 'f3()'}}
+ constexpr int f4() {
+ int *p = new int;
+ bool b = p == &extern_n; // nointerpreter-note {{comparison between pointers to unrelated objects '&{*new int#0}' and '&extern_n' has unspecified value}} \
+ // interpreter-note {{initializer of 'extern_n' is unknown}}
+ delete p;
+ return b;
+ }
+ static_assert(!f4()); // expected-error {{static assertion expression is not an integral constant expression}} \
+ // expected-note {{in call to 'f4()'}}
}
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Labels
clang:frontend
Language frontend issues, e.g. anything involving "Sema"
clang
Clang issues not falling into any other category
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport 20c8e3c
Requested by: @efriedma-quic