Skip to content

RF/DOC: Parser defaults #3487

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Jul 29, 2025
Merged

RF/DOC: Parser defaults #3487

merged 4 commits into from
Jul 29, 2025

Conversation

mgxd
Copy link
Collaborator

@mgxd mgxd commented Jul 24, 2025

Renders fmriprep proper defaults in the sphinx documentation.

A few drive-by changes:

  • --no-submm-recon and --no-msm are now argparse.BooleanOptionalActions
  • --work-dir default is set during argument parsing (to avoid rendering an arbitrary path when docs are built)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 24, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 73.49%. Comparing base (2263b64) to head (a38e10f).
⚠️ Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
fmriprep/cli/parser.py 50.00% 1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #3487   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   73.49%   73.49%           
=======================================
  Files          60       60           
  Lines        4572     4580    +8     
  Branches      584      585    +1     
=======================================
+ Hits         3360     3366    +6     
- Misses       1084     1085    +1     
- Partials      128      129    +1     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

@effigies effigies merged commit 2961392 into nipreps:master Jul 29, 2025
21 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants