-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.6k
BUG: Fix lost precision with common type of uint64/int64 #61679
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
pbrochart
wants to merge
12
commits into
pandas-dev:main
Choose a base branch
from
pbrochart:main
base: main
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
+30
−18
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
12 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
02126dd
BUG: Fix implicit conversion to float64 with isin()
pbrochart 73ad0dc
fix pre-commit
pbrochart e0afe0b
fix type
pbrochart 802ac84
fix typo
pbrochart 670a8f9
remove import of numpy and pandas
pbrochart eaba844
import code into isin() and remove function
pbrochart 924f665
fix pre-commit
pbrochart 10debda
fix type
pbrochart c8f854c
remove unused type
pbrochart fb52fb6
better patch
pbrochart a2f2bff
another better patch
pbrochart d996cf6
[pre-commit.ci] auto fixes from pre-commit.com hooks
pre-commit-ci[bot] File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hi,
I'm just skimming issues so have not looked in detail.
By glancing through I see we are changing tested behavior. This sort of suggests intentional behavior and not a bug per se. If it is a longstanding behavior we may want to deprecate first as a breaking API change?
In pandas we normally want to avoid object type, I don't see any discussion that this is an agreed way forward?