Skip to content

Add NASA POWER to iotools #2500

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

IoannisSifnaios
Copy link
Contributor

@IoannisSifnaios IoannisSifnaios commented Jul 15, 2025

  • I am familiar with the contributing guidelines
  • Tests added
  • Updates entries in docs/sphinx/source/reference for API changes.
  • Adds description and name entries in the appropriate "what's new" file in docs/sphinx/source/whatsnew for all changes. Includes link to the GitHub Issue with :issue:`num` or this Pull Request with :pull:`num`. Includes contributor name and/or GitHub username (link with :ghuser:`user`).
  • New code is fully documented. Includes numpydoc compliant docstrings, examples, and comments where necessary.
  • Pull request is nearly complete and ready for detailed review.
  • Maintainer: Appropriate GitHub Labels (including remote-data) and Milestone are assigned to the Pull Request and linked Issue.

This PR adds a function to get irradiance and weather data from NASA POWER. read_the_docs_link

@IoannisSifnaios IoannisSifnaios added this to the v0.13.1 milestone Jul 15, 2025
@IoannisSifnaios
Copy link
Contributor Author

@AdamRJensen could you give some first feedback on this?

Also, should there also be a read_nasa_power function or not?

@AdamRJensen
Copy link
Member

Also, should there also be a read_nasa_power function or not?

I suggest just adding a get_nasa_power function for now. If there is a need for a read function, we can always add that later.

Copy link
Member

@AdamRJensen AdamRJensen left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Initial review

@IoannisSifnaios IoannisSifnaios marked this pull request as ready for review July 16, 2025 13:49
Copy link
Member

@kandersolar kandersolar left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

A few comments, overall looks pretty good to me! Seems like the API is a little slow but not terrible: 16 seconds for a year of data.

@IoannisSifnaios
Copy link
Contributor Author

When running pytest locally, it says that the first test is skipped. Any ideas why this is (and also, is it a problem)?

@echedey-ls
Copy link
Contributor

When running pytest locally, it says that the first test is skipped. Any ideas why this is (and also, is it a problem)?

@IoannisSifnaios that's due to the flags that make the iotools tests only run when explicitly requested. The pytest command you must run is in workflows/pytest-remote-data.yml:

run: pytest tests/iotools --cov=./ --cov-report=xml --remote-data

cov parameters are just for the coverage file, you don't need em.

@IoannisSifnaios
Copy link
Contributor Author

When running pytest locally, it says that the first test is skipped. Any ideas why this is (and also, is it a problem)?

@IoannisSifnaios that's due to the flags that make the iotools tests only run when explicitly requested. The pytest command you must run is in workflows/pytest-remote-data.yml:

run: pytest tests/iotools --cov=./ --cov-report=xml --remote-data

cov parameters are just for the coverage file, you don't need em.

I guess based on the workflow description, there should also be a remote_data label added, right?

@echedey-ls
Copy link
Contributor

echedey-ls commented Jul 21, 2025

there should also be a remote_data label added, right?

Yup, that's right!

Edit: in fact, see it's one of the instructions (the last one) on the PR template

@IoannisSifnaios IoannisSifnaios added the remote-data triggers --remote-data pytests label Jul 21, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
io remote-data triggers --remote-data pytests
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

6 participants