Skip to content

GH-99183: Document behavior of count() for empty substrings #99339

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 10, 2022

Conversation

rhettinger
Copy link
Contributor

@rhettinger rhettinger commented Nov 10, 2022

Copy link
Member

@stevendaprano stevendaprano left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me! Thank you.

@miss-islington
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks @rhettinger for the PR 🌮🎉.. I'm working now to backport this PR to: 3.10, 3.11.
🐍🍒⛏🤖

miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-99347 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.11 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.11 only security fixes label Nov 10, 2022
miss-islington pushed a commit to miss-islington/cpython that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
@bedevere-bot
Copy link

GH-99348 is a backport of this pull request to the 3.10 branch.

@bedevere-bot bedevere-bot removed the needs backport to 3.10 only security fixes label Nov 10, 2022
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 2f4af2d)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <[email protected]>
miss-islington added a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 10, 2022
(cherry picked from commit 2f4af2d)

Co-authored-by: Raymond Hettinger <[email protected]>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
docs Documentation in the Doc dir skip news
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants