Skip to content

update to literal-escaper-0.0.5 #143631

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2025
Merged

update to literal-escaper-0.0.5 #143631

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 17, 2025

Conversation

hkBst
Copy link
Member

@hkBst hkBst commented Jul 8, 2025

Quoting from the changelog, this version brings:

  • Use NonZero<char/u8> in unescape_c_str and check_raw_c_str to statically exclude nuls
  • Add #[inline] to small functions for improved performance

@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 8, 2025

r? @compiler-errors

rustbot has assigned @compiler-errors.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 8, 2025
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 8, 2025

These commits modify the Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

These commits modify the library/Cargo.lock file. Unintentional changes to library/Cargo.lock can be introduced when switching branches and rebasing PRs.

If this was unintentional then you should revert the changes before this PR is merged.
Otherwise, you can ignore this comment.

@compiler-errors
Copy link
Member

@bors r+ rollup

@bors
Copy link
Collaborator

bors commented Jul 16, 2025

📌 Commit d44dcd4 has been approved by compiler-errors

It is now in the queue for this repository.

@bors bors added S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. and removed S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. labels Jul 16, 2025
bors added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
Rollup of 11 pull requests

Successful merges:

 - #143326 (Remove deprecated `Error::description` impl from `c_str::FromBytesWithNulError`)
 - #143431 (Use relative visibility when noting sealed trait to reduce false positive)
 - #143550 (resolve: Use interior mutability for extern module map)
 - #143631 (update to literal-escaper-0.0.5)
 - #143793 (Opaque type collection: Guard against endlessly recursing free alias types)
 - #143880 (tests: Test line debuginfo for linebreaked function parameters)
 - #143914 (Reword mismatched-lifetime-syntaxes text based on feedback)
 - #143926 (Remove deprecated fields in bootstrap)
 - #143955 (Make frame spans appear on a separate trace line)
 - #143975 (type_id_eq: check that the hash fully matches the type)
 - #143984 (Fix ice for feature-gated `cfg` attributes applied to the crate)

r? `@ghost`
`@rustbot` modify labels: rollup
@bors bors merged commit 465ae94 into rust-lang:master Jul 17, 2025
11 checks passed
@rustbot rustbot added this to the 1.90.0 milestone Jul 17, 2025
rust-timer added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 17, 2025
Rollup merge of #143631 - hkBst:update-escaper-2, r=compiler-errors

update to literal-escaper-0.0.5

Quoting from the changelog, this version brings:
- Use `NonZero<char/u8>` in `unescape_c_str` and `check_raw_c_str` to statically exclude nuls
- Add `#[inline]` to small functions for improved performance
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-bors Status: Waiting on bors to run and complete tests. Bors will change the label on completion. T-compiler Relevant to the compiler team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants