Skip to content

Rename bool::ok_or[_else] to bool::then_ok_or[_else] to avoid confusion with Option::ok_or[_else] #144037

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

LimpSquid
Copy link
Contributor

Relevant tracking issue: #142748 (comment)

Rename bool to result methods in order to avoid confusion with
Option::ok_or[_else].
@rustbot
Copy link
Collaborator

rustbot commented Jul 16, 2025

r? @jhpratt

rustbot has assigned @jhpratt.
They will have a look at your PR within the next two weeks and either review your PR or reassign to another reviewer.

Use r? to explicitly pick a reviewer

@rustbot rustbot added S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue. labels Jul 16, 2025
@jhpratt
Copy link
Member

jhpratt commented Jul 17, 2025

r=me with anyone from @rust-lang/libs-api concurring design-wise (as this alters an accepted ACP).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
S-waiting-on-review Status: Awaiting review from the assignee but also interested parties. T-libs Relevant to the library team, which will review and decide on the PR/issue.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants