-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
Fix tail calling intrinsics #144815
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Closed
Closed
Fix tail calling intrinsics #144815
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
2 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
@@ -0,0 +1,18 @@ | ||
//@ run-pass | ||
#![feature(explicit_tail_calls, core_intrinsics)] | ||
#![expect(incomplete_features, internal_features)] | ||
|
||
fn trans((): ()) { | ||
// transmute is lowered in a mir pass | ||
unsafe { become std::mem::transmute(()) } | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn cats(x: u64) -> u32 { | ||
become std::intrinsics::ctlz(x) | ||
} | ||
|
||
fn main() { | ||
trans(()); | ||
assert_eq!(cats(17), 59); | ||
} | ||
|
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hmm, I opened the code change thinking "well, if this is small then whatever we can just do it", but needing all these
cont
s is kinda annoying, and I definitely don't think I'd (personally) be excited to write double the tests to make sure that the call and thebecome
both work the next time I add something to this fine.How many intrinsics exist in the wild that are allowed to be called from stable? Could we do something simpler just for those? Then we could just do an rust-lang/compiler-team#620 ICE for TailCall'ing any other intrinsic.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From searching for
#[stable
in https://doc.rust-lang.org/stable/src/core/intrinsics/mod.rs.html#3830, it appears it's onlytransmute
(there are a few other stable functions, but they are wrapper functions, not intrinsics directly)Gives this and #144815 (comment) I'm inclined to say it's fine to forbid tail-calling intrinsics. I think I'll change this PR to make it an error to tail call an intrinsic.