Skip to content

Increase coverage #518

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Draft
wants to merge 52 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

allnes
Copy link
Member

@allnes allnes commented Jul 4, 2025

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 4, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 93.66%. Comparing base (2f87c86) to head (64d5430).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #518      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   94.72%   93.66%   -1.06%     
==========================================
  Files          11       18       +7     
  Lines         360      505     +145     
  Branches      122       58      -64     
==========================================
+ Hits          341      473     +132     
- Misses          5       12       +7     
- Partials       14       20       +6     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

allnes added 4 commits July 6, 2025 01:16
…tom terminate handler to enhance test flexibility
…ation and test comments for consistency and formatting improvement
…de and improve docstring formatting for clarity
@allnes allnes force-pushed the an/increase-coverage-1 branch from 328e530 to bdb4ef2 Compare July 6, 2025 00:35
allnes added 14 commits July 6, 2025 02:45
…olidating file searches and removing redundant path logic
…py and add gcov error ignoring for coverage generation
…rings, update workflow logic for coverage generation consistency
…st logic and update GitHub Actions for environment consistency
…s for consistency and simplify file generation logic
…ecks, enhanced debug outputs, and refined command logic
@github-actions github-actions bot added the task label Jul 7, 2025
allnes added 6 commits July 7, 2025 17:44
…k-specific files and ensure unique entries
This commit introduces tests for various edge cases, including handling of built-in types, anonymous structs, deep namespace chains, special mangling cases, complex templates, and simulated MSVC behavior on non-Windows platforms. It ensures robust coverage for demangling logic and namespace extraction across diverse scenarios.
This commit introduces tests for various scenarios, including anonymous namespaces, global types, function pointers, arrays, nested templates, reference and pointer types, `std` types, const/volatile qualifiers, and lambda types. It ensures thorough validation of namespace extraction and demangling logic.
Adjusted tests for extremely long type names and `std::nullptr_t` to account for potential compiler differences in namespace resolution. Ensures compatibility with varying demangling behaviors.
Refactored tests to improve clarity and robustness. Updated type definitions to modern equivalents (`std::array`, `enum` with explicit width, etc.) and replaced namespace definitions with inline syntax. Expanded test cases for built-in, unsigned, floating-point, and character types to ensure comprehensive coverage of edge scenarios.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant