Skip to content

[lldb] Use RemoteAddress's address space for the file cache optimization #10979

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

augusto2112
Copy link

Now that RemoteAddress carries its address space, instead of using a high bit to turn on the filecache optimization, use that instead. This way we are guaranteed to not clash with any pointer authentication masks.

rdar://148361743

Now that RemoteAddress carries its address space, instead of using a
high bit to turn on the filecache optimization, use that instead. This
way we are guaranteed to not clash with any pointer authentication
masks.

rdar://148361743
@augusto2112 augusto2112 requested a review from kastiglione July 10, 2025 18:29
@augusto2112 augusto2112 marked this pull request as ready for review July 10, 2025 18:29
@augusto2112 augusto2112 requested a review from a team as a code owner July 10, 2025 18:29
@augusto2112
Copy link
Author

@swift-ci test

@augusto2112
Copy link
Author

swiftlang/swift#82995
@swift-ci test

Copy link

@kastiglione kastiglione left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is the use of the term "tagged address" still applicable?

@augusto2112
Copy link
Author

Is the use of the term "tagged address" still applicable?

Yeah I was on the fence on that one... They're still "tagged" with the new address space, but I could change that to something else.

@augusto2112
Copy link
Author

swiftlang/swift#82995

@swift-ci test

@augusto2112
Copy link
Author

swiftlang/swift#82995

@swift-ci test macOS

@augusto2112 augusto2112 merged commit 49d0143 into swiftlang:stable/20240723 Jul 11, 2025
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants