accumulate: remove Lisp-specific portion #586
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Elixir-specific portion added: exercism/exercism#1136 Lisp-specific portion added: exercism/problem-specifications#98 Elixir-specific portion removed because the `Enum.reduce` was not necessary: exercism/problem-specifications#274 It doesn't seem to make much sense to include this Lisp-specific sentence in non-Lisp tracks. exercism/problem-specifications#871
rbasso
approved these changes
Sep 7, 2017
|
I can't really complain since personal issues mean I haven't been able to review anything the past month, so I also barely noticed that this went unreviewed. So, apology accepted. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Elixir-specific portion added:
exercism/exercism#1136
Lisp-specific portion added:
exercism/problem-specifications#98
Elixir-specific portion removed because the
Enum.reducewas notnecessary:
exercism/problem-specifications#274
It doesn't seem to make much sense to include this Lisp-specific
sentence in non-Lisp tracks.
exercism/problem-specifications#871