Skip to content

Point out that using MAPCAR is idiomatic Lisp #98

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 27, 2015

Conversation

canweriotnow
Copy link
Contributor

Like the caveat about Erlang, it should be pointed out that using MAPCAR is the standard Lisp-y way of doing things - the alternative is the Common Lisp LOOP macro, which actually isn't very idiomatic of Lisp in general.

kytrinyx added a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 27, 2015
Point out that using MAPCAR is idiomatic Lisp
@kytrinyx kytrinyx merged commit fe3d452 into exercism:master Jul 27, 2015
ijanos pushed a commit to exercism/rust that referenced this pull request Sep 1, 2017
Elixir-specific portion added:
exercism/exercism#1136

Lisp-specific portion added:
exercism/problem-specifications#98

Elixir-specific portion removed because the `Enum.reduce` was not
necessary:
exercism/problem-specifications#274

It doesn't seem to make much sense to include this Lisp-specific
sentence in non-Lisp tracks.

exercism/problem-specifications#871
petertseng added a commit to exercism/haskell that referenced this pull request Sep 8, 2017
Elixir-specific portion added:
exercism/exercism#1136

Lisp-specific portion added:
exercism/problem-specifications#98

Elixir-specific portion removed because the `Enum.reduce` was not
necessary:
exercism/problem-specifications#274

It doesn't seem to make much sense to include this Lisp-specific
sentence in non-Lisp tracks.

exercism/problem-specifications#871
emcoding pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Nov 19, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants